|
|
What is
Employee Engagement?
The traditional definition: The
degree to which employees are
personally committed to helping
an organization by doing a
better job than what is required
to hold the job.
I consider that definition
incomplete at best. It sounds
like a tactic for organizations
to continue to get more for
less. At the same time, no one
can argue that it defines what
we all want, whether you are the
CEO or the shareholder, or the
manager or co-worker of the
employee that is engaged to the
point of going above and beyond
what is required.
I’d prefer to add a more
employee-centric definition:
Engagement is when employees get
to utilize their skills,
strengths, and innate
creativity, and to contribute to
something meaningful. Then it
follows that they will put forth
careful effort, demonstrate
motivation, and perform at an
above-average level. Thus
leading to what we all want as
business leaders: improved
business results.
What difference does it make?
The statement that employee
engagement leads to tangible
business results is not just an
opinion. It’s backed up by
extensive research utilizing
hundreds of focus groups and
thousands of employee interviews
at all levels in diverse
industries worldwide. Employee
engagement impacts business
outcomes.
How do you know when you have
it?
One way to know is to ask.
Regular employee satisfaction
surveys are a standard process
in most large organizations. But
the more important question
might be: What does it look
like? Poor engagement results on
an employee opinion survey
should not surprise leaders. The
signs were there all along,
waiting to be noticed.
What produces employee
engagement? Connection. What
kind of connection?
-
Connection to
the strategic direction of
the company
-
Connection to the
direct manager
-
Connection to personal empowerment
Why does change –
any change – endanger employee
engagement? Change threatens the
modes of connection.
Connection to Strategic
Direction
When there is organizational
change, whether due to
merger/acquisition, leadership
change, or competitive and
economic pressures or
opportunities, there is usually
some significant change in
strategic direction. And often
the employees that we wish to
keep engaged are the last to be
informed of the reason for the
change in direction, what the
new direction is, and why it
holds promise for the future. A
dropped connection.
Connection to the Manager
Time and time again, research
shows us that employees are not
loyal to companies – they are
loyal to people. The direct
manager has the single biggest
impact on employee engagement.
And if these managers, from team
leaders through senior
executive, are not engaged
themselves, or are incapable of
communicating the reasons for –
and payoff of – change, in ways
that enlighten and inspire, the
front-line employees will remain
disconnected from the company.
That impacts their ability to
connect with the customer.
Connection to Personal
Empowerment
A key lever for building
engagement in the face of change
is building or restoring a sense
of personal empowerment, which
includes resilience, personal
responsibility, and uncommon
fortitude. It is normal for
people to question these traits
and inner qualities in the face
of change. But what can leaders
do about that?
Restoring or growing personal
empowerment is perhaps the most
difficult and yet is also the
highest impact route to employee
engagement. This path involves
teaching, coaching and reminding
that the mindsets and resulting
day-to-day behavior of each and
every employee does more to
impact the success of an
organization than anything the
executive team can implement. Of
course, leaders must believe
this in order to affect it, and
they must have the skills to
instill resourcefulness and
responsibility, and to empower
in a way that demonstrates and
assures employees that their
ideas, opinions and efforts are
making a difference.
  
Whether your training need is small and focused, or
enterprise-wide, you can count of Frontline Learning to deliver.
For more than 20 years we have been helping organizations
achieve their business objectives with targeted training
initiatives.
|

|