|
You
can easily make the case that the dialogue
in most business environments is never fully
authentic, but when market conditions are
especially challenging, there is no question
that frank and candid conversation suffers.
For many
businesses, a market downturn sets off both
external and internal battles for survival.
And the
first casualty of war is truth.
If you know
that your employer is likely to initiative
significant layoffs in the near future, are
likely to "rock the boat" with information
or opinions that go against the grain of
current management thinking?
If your
business leaders clearly value "problem
solvers" more than "problem identifiers"
(more commonly called whiners) are you
likely to speak up about issues you have
noticed, but do not know how to solve?
During
times like these virtually everyone goes
into survival mode, and they are only
willing to do or say those things that will
enhance their chances for survival.
There are
four particularly destructive behaviors that
become very prevalent during an economic
downturn. You could argue that these
tendencies are always there in practically
any business, but when there is a marked
increase in corporate paranoia and fear,
these behaviors become more common - and
also more destructive. Because now more than
ever most businesses need authentic
engagement and conversation rather than
self-protection.
Here are
the four most problematic business dialogue
patterns during tough economic times:
Business teams
that
openly discuss doubts and challenges are much more
likely to act quickly in a practical manner - to
acknowledge and resolve the crises. And yet, according
to our research, fewer than 30% of business teams are
able to effectively discuss disagreements about the
urgency of economic issues.
-
Mouths shut.
After deciding upon an action plan, most people fail
to hold others accountable for deviating from
agreed-upon execution timelines and deliverables.
And those who fail to meet agreed upon objectives
rarely speak up - they keep their mouths shut and
hope that no one notices they didn't meet a
deadline. Or worse, they fudge their reports to
create the impression that everything is fine.
("We're all green on every project on this
spreadsheet!")
In contrast, high
performing teams are comfortable directly addressing the
issue when someone is not achieving an agreed upon goal.
No one is attacked. These issues are addressed
productively and directly - with the mutual goal of a
successful outcome in mind.
-
Protecting Pets.
In many organizations, individuals conclude that
necessary budget cuts are politically unwise to
bring up. Ideas are withheld because people don't
know how to suggest cuts to the boss's pet project.
And business leaders often send out clear signals
regarding the "undiscussables" that must be
protected at all costs. Even if the leader is
factually and objectively correct, not allowing
engaged dialogue about these issues creates a closed
and fearful dynamic.
Business teams that
aren't mired in these kinds of "undiscussables" are much
more likely to act quickly to resolve a financial
crisis. Because everything is on the table, the
discussions are more complete, have greater depth, and
are more likely to result in an action plan that
produces positive results.
-
Circling Sharks.
By the time actual budget cuts and layoffs occur,
business leaders have convinced themselves that
their decisions are rational, well-informed and
necessary. But more often than they realize, the
cuts are actually irrational, based upon corporate
sharks circling around the weak and defenseless..
Authentic dialogue
can help to ensure that the difficult decisions made are
in fact rational, well-informed and necessary.
What Leaders Can Do
Each of these behaviors represents a pivot point between
agility and a tar pit. Teams that confront these
behaviors through crucial conversations are 250% more
likely to survive. Less agile teams are 360% more likely
to miss millions of dollars in lost opportunities.
Here's how leaders can take control:
Model and Teach Authentic Dialogue Skills. As
leaders foster the dialogue skills required to hold
these crucial conversations, every one of the positive
results described above is enabled as teams reach
consensus, not conflict.
Schedule Regular Financial Workouts. The era of
fixed budgets is over. Agile firms replace fixed budgets
with financial workouts that pit a wide range of
initiatives against clear criteria, revenue, and
strategy to guide their spending. These workouts are led
by the C-suite and scheduled quarterly or in response to
unforeseen shocks.
Publicly Sacrifice a Sacred Cow. Sacrifice
breathes life into new values. When leaders openly
demonstrate that fiscal stewardship is more important
than pet projects or personal ego, cynical team members
begin to "doubt their doubts."
Support Decisions that Favor Timeliness over
Perfection. Most managers believe their leaders
expect perfection. However, fiscally agile leaders
accept that urgent financial decisions are made under
conditions of uncertainty. Good leaders encourage
managers to tailor decisions to the information they
have.
Create Safe "Sub-Dialogues." Leaders who break
fiscal challenges into discrete problems and assign
small cross-functional groups to work in a time-bound
way are more likely to generate solutions. They will see
intelligent cuts proposed rapidly by those who truly
understood and embraced the goals of the reduction.
The greatest barrier to financial agility is not a lack
of intelligence or a lack of time but a lack of focused,
unified dialogue. Leaders who invest in the skills,
time, and support to help their people hold crucial
conversations will generate both profoundly wise and
surprisingly rapid solutions to their financial
challenges. And while the need for financial agility is
paramount in today's economy, the capacity to engage in
candid, timely and wise deliberation pays returns in any
season.
  
|